Digging Deeper into Debt-Money
"... just consider what might happen if mortgage holders realised the money the bank lent them is part of an invisible trap, a game of musical chairs designed by the bankers in which losers are mathematically predetermined to default whenever the creation of new debt to banks slows down, for any reason. The only way to keep the music playing is for all of us as a whole to go further and further into debt to banks forever."
"I claim the so-called “sovereign money” monetary reform movements are all misguided. That is because they mistake the root of the problem for the remedy. They do this because of habitual educational and ideological blinders which result in a stubborn refusal to think through the logical repercussions of lending in a limited “money supply”, regardless of its source. Instead, like the professional economists whose abysmal track record bespeaks a fundamental incompetence, they resort to a magical fallacy I call “fuzzible money” that allows them to avoid calling into question the assumptions that form the foundations for their presumably well-meaning but provably futile reform proposals."
Here's my recursive re-lending analysis and the remedy for the impossible math of conventional banking in 5 illustrated pages
Basic explanations of what money really is
Papers written for peer review
Peer-reviewed paper published by the World Economics Association:
Papers invited by Hypothesis Journal vigorously blocked by over 150 economists:
The main reason given for rejecting my analysis was that I quoted the actual rules of banking from the websites of 3 central banks as my references rather than quote previous papers by economists. The main objection to my proposed alternative is that "It would require change". Seriously... economists rejected my analysis because it is based on documented facts"from the horse's mouth" and rejected my proposal for change because it would require change. What can one do with people like that?
The Banking System, Itself, is the ROOT CAUSE of Money System Instability
In this article, I set out in words the argument that I present in Money as Debt II - Promises Unleashed. I claim that the design of the banking system itself necessarily creates an ongoing shortage of Principal that results in INSTABILITY and potential COLLAPSE of the system in the absence of PERPETUAL DEBT GROWTH. I claim that this occurs, even in the theoretical case of a COMPLETE ABSENCE of INTEREST and with ALL PAYMENTS BEING MADE in full and on time.
The idea that money can be "extinguished" is not intuitively understood by most people.
For most people, the mental concept of money is that it is a positive thing, probably due to the use of debt-free coins for millennia. This is constantly reinforced by our own experience. We successfully trade paper cash and digits in an "account" for food, shelter etc. just as we once traded gold and silver coins for things. We continue to perceive money as something with a positive lasting physical nature, which it no longer is, in reality. Today's debt-money is a time contract for self-extinguishment, existing for only as long as the debt that created it exists.
No one disagrees that banks create money from the borrowers’ promises to pay it back. However, disagreement arises when one side claims that Banks NEVER lend their depositors’ money. This side claims that banks always create new money against new debt. According to this side of the argument, Principal Debt within the banking system can never exceed the Principal created by that debt.
P of money = P of debt that created it.
The other side of the argument claims that banks ALSO effectively lend the depositors’ money deposited (ie. loaned to the bank) in savings accounts, thus lending the same money twice and creating a fundamental shortage of Principal.
P of Principal < 2P of debt of that Principal.
The first side claims that if the banks always create new money against new debt the second claim cannot be true. The following demonstration will explain why that reasoning is in error. Both are true. There is no contradiction. There is only a misunderstanding of what savings really are.
This is a logical proof, laid out in diagrams and animated flow charts, of what is meant by "Twice-Lent" Money and why this simple but overlooked dynamic is crucial.
I believe that it is imperative to change what money IS in the interest of not destroying what is left of our planetary life-support systems. And... I suspect it is safe to say that, unless money is fundamentally re-structured, politics never will be.
I suggest that a sufficient explanatory model is more easily constructed than the author imagines. It was first published in 2009 as animated flow diagrams within Money as Debt II - Promises Unleashed, my animated feature movie (77 min) widespread online.